Information

Sturtevant I DD- 240 - History


Sturtevant I

(DD-240: dp. 1,215 (n.); 1. 314'41/2", b. 30'10Y2~; dr. 9'4" (mean); s. 33.82 k. (tl.), cpl. 122, a. 4 4'V, 1 3", 1 2 2 1" tt.; cl. Clemson)

The first Sturtevant (DD-240) was laid down on 23 November 1918 at Camden, N.J., by the New York Shipbuilding Co.; launched on 29 July 1920, sponsored by Mrs. Curtis Ripley Smith, and commissioned at the Philadelphia Navy Yard on 21 September 1920. Lt. Comdr. Ewart G. Haas assumed command of Sturtevant on 4 November 1920.

In early November of 1920, Sturtevant sailed to Newport, R.I., and thence proceeded to New York City. On 30 November, she departed New York to join the United States Naval Forces, European Waters. She reached Gibraltar on 10 December and, after four days, continued on to the Adriatic Sea. On the 19th she arrived at her new base, Spalato, on the Dalmatian coast, For the next six months, she conducted various missions from Spalato to the ports on the Adriatic littoral.

On 16 June 1921, the destroyer was reassigned from the Adriatic detachment to the Constantinople detachment and, three days later, commenced docking and overhaul at Constantinople. During this assignment Sturtevant conducted drills in the Sea of Marmara, between the twin straits, the Dardanelles and the Bosphorus, and operated in the Black Sea. She visited Samsun, Turkey; Burgas, Bulgaria; and Sulina and Braila on the Rumanian coast. From 25 October to 28 November, she flew the flag of Admiral Bristol. Following this duty, the ship visited the ports of Beirut and Joffa and then Alexandria, Egypt, and the Isle of Rhodes. In late December, she returned to Turkey at Samsun, thence to Constantinople in January 1922 before reentering the Black Sea to visit southern Russia.

Between 1921 and 1923, the Russian Civil War and a drought brought a great famine to Russia, particularly to the usually food-rich Volga region of southern Russia. America responded with nearly a million short tons of food which the Bolsheviks accepted grudgingly and often as surreptitiously as possible. Sturtevant investigated potential ports of debarkation in southern Russia for the supplies soon to be shipped by the American Relief Administration. To this end, she visited Odessa, Sevastopol, Novorossisk; Theodosia, and

Yalta between early February and mid-April. Thereafter, through the end of the year, she made voyages across the Black Sea to various Russian ports in conjunction with the relief operation. She stopped at numerous other foreign ports on the voyages, including Samsun, Trebizond, and Mudania, Turkey. From July to October, she made a round-trip voyage back to the United States, during which she was overhauled at the New York Navy Yard and exercised out of Yorktown, Va.

On 1 October, Sturtevant was ordered back to the eastern Mediterranean and, the following day, got underway for Gibraltar. She arrived there on the 14th and continued on to Turkey, reaching Mudania on the 27th. For the next seven months, the destroyer visited the ports of the eastern Mediterrean and those along the coast of the Black Sea. In addition to ports of call of the previous cruises, she visited Varna, Bulgaria; Mersina and Smyrna, Turkey, Piraeus, Greece and Naples, Italy. From the latter port, she sailed for Gibraltar in late May of 1923 and, by 12 June, was back at the Navy Yard in New York. She operated along the Atlantic seaboard through the end of the year, conducting gunnery exercises in October at the southern drill grounds off Virginia. In November, the ship paid an Armistice Day visit to Baltimore, Md. Three days before the end of the year, Sturtevant became flagship of Division 41, Squadron 14, Scouting Fleet.

In early January, Sturtevant proceeded to the Canal Zone to participate in a war problem with the Scouting Fleet. At the end of the month, she sailed with the Fleet, via Culebra Island, to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and the British West Indies, conducting tactical exercises along the way. In May, the destroyer returned north and operated along the east coast for the remainder of the year. In January 1925, Sturtevant again headed south. After a month and one-half of operations in the Caribbean, she transited the Panama Canal and entered the Pacific. She visited San Diego and San Francisco in California in April before getting underway for the Hawaiian Islands. From late April to mid-June, the ship participated in a joint Army-Navy war problem simulating the attempt of an enemy force to capture the island of Oahu. On 11 June, she set a course for San Diego and arrived on the 17th.

The destroyer started on her return voyage to the Atlantic on the 22d and reached New York City on 16 July. She cruised the Atlantic coast until mid October and then proceeded south for winter maneuvers out of Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Transiting the Panama Canal in late January 1926, she participated in fleet exercises on the Pacific side. Returning to the Atlantic side of the isthmus to resume drills and exercises in the vicinity of Cuba, Sturtevant steamed north to Boston during the first week in May.

Between May 1926 and January 1931, Sturtevant continued to operate with the Atlantic Fleet in Destroyer Division 41, Destroyer Squadron 14. Each year summer operations along the north and central Atlantic coast of the United States were alternated with winter maneuvers in the warm waters of the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. During the fall of 1930, she was assigned Charleston, S.C., as her home port, but was ordered north again in January of 1931 for decommissioning. On 30 January 1931, Sturtevant was placed out of commission at Philadelphia, Pa.

She was recommissioned there on 9 March 1932 and, on 30 April, reported for duty to the Commander, Special Service Squadron, at Coco Solo in the Canal Zone. For the next two years, the destroyer plied the warm and troubled waters of the Gulf and the Caribbean, supporting the activities of the marines ashore in Nicaragua, Haiti, Cuba, and other Latin American republics. Early in 1934, she left the Special Service Squadron to reJoin the destroyers of the Scoutinz Force. During this tour of duty, she was homeported at Norfolk, Va.

In the latter half of 1935, the ship was reassigned to the Battle Force, located in the Pacific. After operating out of San Diego until 20 November, she was decommissioned once again.

On 26 September 1939, Sturtevant was recommissioned once more. By mid 1940, she was back in the Atlantic escorting convoys and conducting neutrality patrols along the eastern seaboard. The destroyer operated out of Norfolk, Va., in the North Atlantic until early March 1942, then escorted a convoy from New York to the Canal Zone. There she reported for duty to the Commander, Caribbean Sea Frontier, screening convoys between the various ports of the Caribbean until late April.

On 26 April, she departed Key West in company with a convoy. Just over two hours out of port, a violent explosion lifted Sturtevant's stern from the water, but caused no apparent damage. Thinking herself under submarine attack, the destroyer dropped two depth charge barrages. About a minute after she
dropped the second barrage of charges, a second detonation rocked the ship. She began to settle rapidly, but on an even keel. Minutes later, a third burst ripped her keel apart beneath the after deckhouse. The midships section sank immediately, and the stern settled soon thereafter. The bow curiously remained above water for several hours. Finally, however, all but the crow's nest disappeared beneath the waves. Probably the victim of a mine, Sturtevant went down off Key West about eight miles north of Marquesas Key. Fifteen of her ship's company joined her in the watery grave. Her name was struck from the Navy list on 8 May 1942.


USS Sturtevant (DD-240), progress picture, stern view, at New York Shipbuilding Company, Camden, New Jersey, January 1918 [2244 x 2871]

After seeing so many bigger ships in this sub this seems a little flimsy looking.

Also, from the wiki the ship's fate is kind of interesting:

On 26 April 1942, she departed Key West in company with a convoy. Just over two hours out of port, a violent explosion lifted Sturtevant's stern from the water, but caused no apparent damage. Thinking herself under submarine attack, the destroyer dropped two depth charge barrages. About a minute after she dropped the second barrage of charges, a second detonation rocked the ship. She began to settle rapidly, but on an even keel. Minutes later, a third explosion ripped her keel apart beneath the after deckhouse. The midships section sank immediately, and the stern settled soon thereafter. The bow, curiously, remained above water for several hours. Finally, however, all but the crow's nest disappeared beneath the waves. Sturtevant went down off Key West about 8 mi (13 km) north of the Marquesas Keys. Fifteen of her crew were lost with the ship.

Sturtevant lies as two sections in 60 ft (18 m) of water.[3]

It was later determined that Sturtevant passed through an American-laid minefield of whose existence the crew had not been notified. Her name was struck from the Naval Vessel Register on 8 May 1942.


Seznam voja&scaronkih vsebin podaja članke, ki se v Wikipediji nana&scaronajo na vojsko, oborožene sile, za&scarončito in obrambo.

Unijapedija je koncept, zemljevid ali semantično mrežo, organizirano kot enciklopedije - slovar. To je na kratko opredelitev vsakega koncepta in njegovih odnosov.

To je velikanski spletni mentalni zemljevid, ki služi kot osnova za koncept diagramov. To je prost za uporabo in vsak članek ali dokument, ki se lahko prenese. To je orodje, vir ali predlog za študije, raziskave, izobraževanje, učenje in poučevanje, ki jih učitelji, vzgojitelji, dijaki ali študenti lahko uporablja Za akademskega sveta: za šolo, primarno, sekundarno, gimnazije, srednje tehnične stopnje, šole, univerze, dodiplomski, magistrski ali doktorski stopinj za papir, poročil, projektov, idej, dokumentacije, raziskav, povzetkov, ali teze. Tu je definicija, razlaga, opis ali pomen vsakega pomembno, na kateri želite informacije in seznam njihovih povezanih konceptov kot pojmovnika. Na voljo v Slovenski, Angleščina, Španski, Portugalski, Japonski, Kitajski, Francosko, Nemški, Italijansko, Poljski, Nizozemski, Rusko, Arabsko, Hindi, Švedski, Ukrajinski, Madžarski, Katalonščina, Češka, Hebrejščina, Danski, Finski, Indonezijski, Norveški, Romunščina, Turški, Vietnamščina, Korejščina, Thai, Grški, Bolgarski, Hrvaški, Slovak, Litvanski, Filipino, Latvijski in Estonski Več jezikov kmalu.

Google Play, Android in logotip Googla Play sta blagovni znamki podjetja Google Inc.


Använd torr ved i lämplig storlek. Den bästa veden brukar vara rönn, bok, ask, lönn och björk. Oavsett vilken ved du använder är det lämpligt att mellanlagra veden ett dygn i inomhustemperatur innan du eldar. Använd finkluven ved för att få en bra glödbädd. Elden ska brinna, inte pyra. Rätt mängd förbränningsluft gör att elden brinner med klara och livliga lågor. Kontrollera röken. Den ska vara genomskinlig, inte svart. I Naturvårdsverkets broschyr Elda rätt hittar du fler tips.

Kom ihåg att installation av eldstad eller kamin kräver anmälan till byggnadsnämnden. Du måste ha fått startbesked från byggnadsnämnden innan du kan påbörja arbetet.


Office of Licensing

Pursuant to §37.2-405, DBHDS licenses public and private providers of community services throughout Virginia. DBHDS licenses services that provide treatment, training, support and rehabilitation to individuals who have mental illness, developmental disabilities or substance abuse disorders, to individuals receiving services under the Medicaid DD Waiver, or to individuals receiving services in residential facilities for individuals with brain injuries.

ANNOUNCEMENTS

    (June 2021) (4.19.21) (training) (4.20.21) (training) (April 2021) [doc] (April 2021)
  • Policy and Procedure Attestation Form [doc] (April 2021) (March 2021) (March 2021)
  • Memo - Grace Period for Documentation of ISPs (March 2021) (Febuary 2021) Memo - Stakeholder (September 2020) --> (August 2020) (July 2020) (July 2020) (May 2020) (March 2020) (March 2020)

Public Comment Requested on DRAFT Revisions to the Licensing Regulations

Please see the memo below with information on providing comment in three public forums accessible at this link on Virginia's Town Hall, https://www.townhall.virginia.gov/L/Forums.cfm , or by emailing comments to [email protected], or by fax or mailing (see the details within the memo).

Behavioral Health Enhancement and ASAM

    (4.19.21) (training) (4.20.21) (training) (4.19.21) (4.20.21) (April 2021)
  • Policy and Procedure Attestation Form [doc] (April 2021) (March 2021) (March 2021) (Febuary 2021)

SERIOUS INCIDENTS

    (May 2021) (May 2021) (July 2019) (January 2021)
  • Guidance for Serious Incident Reporting (November 2020)
  • Guidance on Incident Reporting Requirements (August 2020) (March 2020) (February 2020) (October 2019) MRC Memo (July 2019) -->

CHRIS TRAINING

- Creating A New Death Case (August 2019) - Updating A Serious Incident (August 2019) - Updating A Death Record (August 2019) -->

OTHER SERVICES

    for DBHDS-licensed providers of ADULT care positions. for DBHDS-licensed CHILDREN'S RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES.

moved below collapse 01132021

Central Office Contact Information

P.O. Box 1797
Richmond, VA 23218
Office (804) 786-1747

License Renewal & Modification

License Renewal

Renewal application – Please use this form to renew an existing license. Your completed Renewal Application should be mailed to the address below. For providers of children’s residential services, please also include your money order in the amount of $100.00 made out “Treasurer of Virginia” with your Renewal Application.

DBHDS
Attention: Office of Licensing
P.O. Box 1797
Richmond, VA 23218-1797

Service Modification of License

Service Modification Application - Please use this form when you are already licensed to provide children's residential services and want to want to modify the license or add a service or location. Please submit the completed form 45 days prior to implementation of the modification.

Guidance and Technical Assistance

    (June 2021) (June 2021) (June 2021) (Updated March 2021) (Updated March 2021) (January 2021) (January 2021)
  • Risk Management & Quality Improvement Strategies Training
    by the Center for Developmental Disabilities Evaluation & Research - Recorded Webinar (December 2020)
  • Risk Management & Quality Improvement Strategies Training
    by the Center for Developmental Disabilities Evaluation & Research - Handout (December 2020) (November 2020) (November 2020) (January 2021) (January 2021) Guidance For Quality Improvement Program (November 2020)
  • Guidance for Serious Incident Reportings (November 2020)
    (Updated March 2021) (Updated March 2021)
  • Risk Management & Quality Improvement Strategies Training
    by the Center for Developmental Disabilities Evaluation & Research - Recorded Webinar (December 2020)
  • Risk Management & Quality Improvement Strategies Training
    by the Center for Developmental Disabilities Evaluation & Research - Handout (December 2020) (November 2020) (November 2020) (October 2020)
    (Updated March 2021) (January 2021) (November 2020) (November 2020) (August 2020)
  • Guidance on Incident Reporting Requirements (August 2020) (August 2020) (May 2020) (June 2017) (June 2017) (October 2015) (March 2017) (September 2016) (June 2016)

Guidance For Medication Administration Training

File A Complaint - (Click here to open and complete form.)

Instructions to send and attach Complaint Form as a Word document:


Latest History

Nestled on 15 acres off West Washington Street, the immaculately landscaped grounds mirror the polished interior of the 35-year-old Suffolk plant, its rows of German machinery greased and gleaming. The building's facade is splashed with vivid red trim and distinctive vertical stripes of bright yellow.

… Five million pounds of tea fill the warehouse. Sugar - 50 million pounds a year - is brought in by rail car to be used in the presweetened mixes.

Each Flo-Thru bag combines as many as 50 black teas from around the world to produce Lipton 's distinctive ``brisk'' flavor. Cellophane wrapped boxes - Lipton red and yellow for regular, and the newer green and yellow for decaffeinated - come off the assembly line ready for shipment to grocer's shelves.

A world map points out regions of the world that Lipton gets its tea leaves from. Plant manager Ralph Roberts holds a tasters cup like the ones used daily for taste testing.


The Cold War (1945–1989)

In the years following the Second World War in Greece, the Communists engaged in violent conflicts against the government forces who were receiving massive military and financial aid from Britain and, later, from the USA. These countries feared that Greece, the last of the Balkan states to resist Soviet domination, would in turn fall to the Communists. As a neighbour of Turkey, Greece was an area of prime importance from an economic and strategic viewpoint for preventing Soviet domination of the Eastern Mediterranean and protecting Middle East oil supplies. The United States was therefore committed to preserving the independence and territorial integrity of the kingdom and encouraged the authorities to establish a government of national unity and to undertake a series of economic reforms. By launching a campaign that would culminate in victory for the royalist armies within two years, the United States assumed the position of undisputed leader of the ‘free world’. Greece enjoyed the benefits of the Marshall Plan and gradually became part of the Western system, joining the Council of Europe in 1949 and NATO in 1951. The defeat of the Communist revolt in Greece, in which more than 50 000 people died, marked the end of the spread of Soviet influence in Europe.


Continuity of care after percutaneous coronary intervention: The patient's perspective across secondary and primary care settings

Background: Although patients may experience a quick recovery followed by rapid discharge after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs), continuity of care from hospital to home can be particularly challenging. Despite this fact, little is known about the experiences of care across the interface between secondary and primary healthcare systems in patients undergoing PCI.

Aim: To explore how patients undergoing PCI experience continuity of care between secondary and primary care settings after early discharge.

Methods: The study used an inductive exploratory design by performing in-depth interviews of 22 patients at 6-8 weeks after PCI. Nine were women and 13 were men 13 were older than 67 years of age. Eight lived remotely from the PCI centre. Patients were purposively recruited from the Norwegian Registry for Invasive Cardiology. Interviews were analysed by qualitative content analysis.

Findings: Patients undergoing PCI were satisfied with the technical treatment. However, patients experienced an unplanned patient journey across care boundaries. They were not receiving adequate instruction and information on how to integrate health information. Patients also needed help to facilitate connections to community-based resources and to schedule clear follow-up appointments.

Conclusions and implications: As high-technology treatment dramatically expands, healthcare organisations need to be concerned about all dimensions of continuity. Patients are witnessing their own processes of healthcare delivery and therefore their voices should be taken into greater account when discussing continuity of care. Nurse-led initiatives to improve continuity of care involve a range of interventions at different levels of the healthcare system.

Keywords: Percutaneous coronary intervention continuity of care healthcare levels nursing qualitative content analysis qualitative method.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


The Cold War (1945–1989)

On 11 March 1985, at the age of 54 , Mikhail Gorbachev, an apparatchik of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), was appointed General Secretary of the CPSU by the Central Committee. He aimed to carry out a root-and-bran ch reform of the Soviet system, the bureaucratic inertia of which constituted an obstacle to economic reconstruction (‘perestroika’), and, at the same time, to liberalise the regime and introduce transparency (‘glasnost’), i.e. a certain freedom of expression and information.

In order to implement this ambitious policy successfully, Gorbachev had to limit the USSR’s international commitments and reduce its military expenditure so as to curb the country’s moral and economic decline. This resulted in a resumption of dialogue between the Americans and the Soviets concerning nuclear arms and the establishment of closer relations with the European Community. At the same time, Gorbachev terminated Soviet involvement in other parts of the world, withdrawing from Afghanistan, where the Russian army was bogged down, exerting pressure on the Vietnamese to withdraw from Cambodia and restoring Sino-Soviet relations, withdrawing Soviet support for the Mengistu regime in Ethiopia and for Cuban troops in Angola, ending economic aid to Cuba and withdrawing Soviet troops from the island, restoring diplomatic relations with Israel and condemning Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait. Gorbachev’s policy of disengagement would be even more marked in Europe, with regard to the former satellite states of the USSR.

Although popular with the West, Gorbachev was far less so in his own country, where his reforms resulted in the disruption of the centralised planning system without the implementation of any real market mechanisms. This resulted in reduced production, shortages and social discontent, which led to strikes. This discontent could be all the more strongly expressed within the system of ‘transparency’ all previously withheld information concerning the activities of the state and its administrative bodies might henceforth be disclosed and publicly debated. The lifting of the taboos imposed by the Communist regime, of which intellectuals and liberated dissidents took full advantage, allowed critical judgment to be passed on the history of the Soviet Union and on its political, economic and social structure.


Paleogene Period

Our editors will review what you’ve submitted and determine whether to revise the article.

Paleogene Period, also spelled Palaeogene Period, oldest of the three stratigraphic divisions of the Cenozoic Era spanning the interval between 66 million and 23 million years ago. Paleogene is Greek meaning “ancient-born” and includes the Paleocene (Palaeocene) Epoch (66 million to 56 million years ago), the Eocene Epoch (56 million to 33.9 million years ago), and the Oligocene Epoch (33.9 million to 23 million years ago). The term Paleogene was devised in Europe to emphasize the similarity of marine fossils found in rocks of the first three Cenozoic epochs, as opposed to the later fossils of the Neogene Period (23 million to 2.6 million years ago) and the Quaternary Period (2.6 million years ago to the present). In North America, the Cenozoic has traditionally been divided only into the Tertiary Period (66 million to 2.6 million years ago) and the Quaternary Period however, the notion that the Tertiary should be replaced by the designations Paleogene and Neogene is becoming more widespread.


Watch the video: Our History: Disability (January 2022).